|
IMPACT ON HISTORY
The Guyana Story
THE ENMORE MARTYRS
By 1948, most sugar workers in Guyana were giving support
to the Guyana Industrial Workers Union (GIWU). On April 22,
1948, cane cutters, backed by the union, went on strike
demanding the abolishment of the existing "cut and load"
system in the fields. This reaping system which forced cane
cutters to load the sugar punts with the cane they cut, was
not popular among cane cutters. It was introduced in 1945,
and from time to time workers had gone on strike to demand
that it should be changed. As part of the demands of the
1948 strike, the cane cutters called for the replacement of
"cut and load" with a "cut and drop" system by which the
cane cutters should cut the cane, but other workers would
load the cut cane into the punts for shipment to the
factory.
In addition to this particular issue, the workers
demanded higher wages and improved living conditions on the
sugar estates. However, the real aim of the strike was to
demand recognition of the GIWU as the bargaining union for
the field and factory workers on all the sugar estates in
the country.
The strike obtained political support from the Political
Affairs Committee (PAC), and the workers were addressed at
numerous public meetings by Dr. Cheddi Jagan, Janet Jagan
and leaders of the GIWU. The PAC bulletins were widely
distributed at these meetings. Dr. Jagan himself was
personally involved in the organization of the strike, and
helped to raise funds across the country to it. Janet Jagan
was also in the forefront in operating soup kitchens for the
striking workers and their families on the sugar estates.
As the strike continued, the recognized union, the MPCA,
urged the workers to return to work saying that their demand
for higher pay would be taken up with the Sugar Producers
Association (SPA). But the workers, who had no confidence in
the MPCA, refused to heed this call and stated that in any
discussions with the SPA they wanted only the GIWU to
represent them. However, the SPA was adamant that
negotiations would be conducted only with the MPCA, the
recognized union.
With sugar production seriously affected by the ongoing
strike, the sugar estates hired scab labor and enticed some
workers to return to work. In retaliation, strikers went to
the fields and chased them away, and in some cases
physically attacked them.
On June 14, the SPA and the MPCA met to discuss the
issues, but no satisfactory agreement was reached. In any
case, the workers were not prepared to accept any agreement
that the MPCA was negotiating, since they felt very strongly
that the union was betraying their interests. On the
following day, some strikers attacked overseers and some
strike-breakers at Nonpariel, and in the evening there were
reports of vandalism, including the cutting of telephone
lines between Georgetown and Enmore.
Early on the morning of June 16 a crowd of about 400
workers gathered outside the factory at Enmore for a protest
and picketing exercise. The management of Enmore Estate was
expecting this protest action, and the evening before had
requested assistance from the Police. Lance Corporal James
and six policemen, each armed with a rifle and six rounds of
ammunition, were earlier sent from Georgetown early on the
morning of June 16 and they reported to the management of
Enmore estate at 4.00 a.m. Two hours later, they and took up
positions in the factory compound which was protected by a
fence 15 feet high with rows of barbed wire running along
the outward struts at the top.
By 10.00 a.m. the crowd had grown to between 500 and 600
persons and was led by one of the workers carrying a red
flag. They attempted to enter the factory compound through
the gates and through two trench gaps at the rear by which
punts entered the factory. But they were prevented from
doing so because the locked gates and the punt gaps were
protected by policemen. A section of the crowd then hurled
bricks and sticks at the policemen, and several persons
managed to enter the compound at the rear of the factory.
The policemen tried to push back the crowd, but after this
effort failed, they opened fire and five workers were killed
and fourteen others were injured.
Lallabagee Kissoon, 30 years old, was shot in the back;
19-year-old Pooran was shot in the leg and pelvis; Rambarran
died from bullet wounds in his leg; Dookhie died in hospital
later that day; and Harry died the following day from severe
spinal injuries. These men, through the years, became known
as the Enmore Martyrs.
On June 17, the funeral of the slain men saw a massive
crowd of people marching behind their coffins from Enmore to
La Repentir Cemetery in Georgetown, a distance of more than
16 miles. This procession of thousands was led by Dr. Cheddi
Jagan and PAC and GIWU leaders. The tragedy and the ultimate
sacrifice of these sugar workers greatly influenced Dr.
Jagan’s political philosophy and outlook. On the grave side
of the Enmore Martyrs surrounded by thousands of mourners,
he made a silent pledge that he would dedicate his entire
life to the cause of the struggle of the Guyanese people
against bondage and exploitation.
To investigate the shooting, the Governor, Sir Charles
Wooley, appointed a commission of enquiry headed by
Frederick Boland, a Supreme Court judge. The two other
members of the commission were S. L. Van Batenburg Stafford
and R. S. Persaud. Evidence was collected from 64 persons
and a report was presented in August 1948. Dr. Jagan, Janet
Jagan and Dr. Lachman-singh refused to testify before the
commission because they felt it was a waste of time owing to
the fact that the commission chairman and members were
openly showing a bias towards the Police and the management
of Enmore Estate.
In their testimony to the Commission, policemen involved
in the shooting claimed that they were forced to shoot to
protect the factory from destruction or damage and to
protect the lives of workers who were on the premises.
The report, as widely expected, justified the shooting.
But it criticized the Police for not applying measures, such
as the use of tear gas, to keep the crowd away from the
factory compound. The members of the commission also felt
that the shooting period went beyond what was reasonable
when they stated: "We are, therefore, of the opinion that
the evidence has established that after the first few shots,
there was firing which went beyond the requirements of the
situation, with the result that Pooran notably and some
others received shots when in actual flight."

|